Agencies | Online Services | Policies

                                          

The Arkansas Lawyer
Spring 2002

Executive Directors' Report


New Overdraft Notification Rule
by Don Hollingsworth
 
email:dhollingsworth@arkbar.com

     Beginning July 1, 2002, Arkansas will join many other states in requiring notification by financial institutions of any overdraft in client trust accounts maintained by attorneys. Attorneys are encouraged to read the new rule which can be found in the December 20, 2001 per curiam opinion by the Supreme Court of Arkansas. To access the opinion electronically, go to www.arkbar.com and click on "New and Noteworthy."
     There will be an overdraft notification agreement between the Supreme Court, through its Office of Professional Conduct, and financial institutions throughout the state. Since the per curiam makes attorney consent to the reporting and production requirements a condition of the privilege to practice law in Arkansas, financial institutions will not have a separate agreement with the attorneys who have client trust accounts with them.
     An important element of the new rule is that financial institutions will automatically notify the Office of Professional Conduct of all overdrafts. Thus, the financial institution is not being asked to evaluate circumstances of an overdraft. Instead, the Office of Professional Conduct is responsible for determining whether further action is necessary. For example, if the overdraft was caused by an accounting error, verification of such can be supplied to the Office. The Office of Professional Conduct will contact the attorney or law firm to request an explanation of an overdraft notification. If there is not a legitimate reason for the overdraft, the Office may take other action, including an audit of the client trust account.
     If a financial institution in Arkansas does not agree to the overdraft notification, no attorney or law firm trust account can be maintained with said financial institution. The Office of Professional Conduct will post on the Supreme Court's website a current list of approved financial institutions.
     Attorneys need to take note of a new record keeping requirement which the Supreme Court adopted in conjunction with the new rule. "Every lawyer engaged in the practice of law... shall maintain and preserve for a period of at least five years, after final disposition of the underlying matter, the records of the accounts, including check books, canceled checks, check stubs ... or other statements of disbursements rendered to clients or other parties with regard to trust funds or similar equivalent records clearly and expressly reflecting the date, amount, source, and explanation for all receipts, withdraws, deliveries and disbursements of the funds or other property of a client." Section 28.G., Procedures Regulating Professional Conduct of Attorneys.
     Some financial institutions have experience with the overdraft notification since they operate in states which already require the notification. The Office of Professional Conduct, through its Executive Director Stark Ligon, has been contacting Arkansas financial institutions about implementation of the notification agreements.
     If you have questions about the new rule, you should contact Stark Ligon at 501-376-0313 or stark.ligon@mail.state.ar.us.
     Some attorneys new to private practice may have questions about establishing or maintaining client trust accounts. Susie Pointer, the Executive Director of the Arkansas IOLTA Foundation, is a resource on these operational aspects of trust accounts, you may contact her at 501-376 1801 or spointer@aristotle.net.
     The Arkansas overdraft rule is based generally on Rule 29 of the Model Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (1996) of the American Bar Association. One of the reasons for enactment of the rule in Arkansas and other states is the fact that operations of client trust accounts is a primary source of disciplinary problems. Even though the vast majority of Arkansas attorneys operate client trust accounts properly, there are instances of attorneys misusing the accounts or not paying close attention to the rules governing them.

return to previous page
    

Vol.37 No.2/Spring 2002                                  The Arkansas Lawyer                                      5